Wednesday, November 19, 2003 .

"thank you"

thank you "duh" for your very enlightening insight on the match.
i must have blindly overlooked such a simple point because im a lousy NY rugby player.
and if it werent for you, i would have probably never have known the truth for the rest of my life.
that would have been real sad wouldnt it?
i appluad you for your galant effort to correct me.
my hat off to you.
thank you so so much.
you "duh" man.

despite the fact that NY rugby does suck...to a very large extent.
we take pride in what we do.
for a team that only has 2 years (or less) of rugby experience...i reckon we play a pretty good game.
given say 6 or 7 extra years...i think we'd be as good as any top notch A div team.
but of course...feel free to refute or disagree.
my comments are based on opinion. and in making opinions, things are subjective.
that's one thing some people have yet to realise.

besides...is was true that Muliaina wasnt there to defend.
what good is a full back if he isnt there to save his team's ass?
sure he's an attacking full back...but like i said, just because he's one third of the world's best backline, doesnt mean he should abandon his defensive position.
also....Muliaina was on blind when Spencer played a long pass to open.
any pro player, i believe, would have anticipated that.
but of course, i may be wrong. Muliaina might have had better intentions of being where he was. or where he wasnt.

Kent earns my respect by being there to make try saving tackles and make clearences almost everytime.
for someone who hasnt seen NY play enough matches...."duh" certainly is hastey to make comments.

anyhow...i bet "duh" must be someone of a relevant authority to make such well informed comments.
i respect you!
you are the great one!
i am honoured by your presence.


screaming infidelity at 9:44 AM
------